Though Hopkins is the Guardian’s defence and security correspondent, the report was placed on the Life Style page of their site:
The odd placement notwithstanding, Hopkins’ piece represents something of a first for the Guardian: an entirely positive take on Israeli society, reporting on gender equality in the IDF – relative parity between men and women serving in Israel’s armed forces which other nations’ militaries are trying to emulate.
Indeed, there were some passages which were not only completely free the Guardian’s institutional bias against the Jewish state, but actually were indistinguishable from what would be written in pro-Israel blogs. Here’s an example.
“Though the Israeli military has a very macho image, the IDF is the most progressive in the world – when measured in terms of at least. Almost one-third of the force and 50% of its officers are female. In the UK, only 13% of the armed forces are women, while there are only slightly more in the US army (13.4%).” [emphasis added]
Yes, that was really written in the Guardian!
Hopkins’ praise of Israel’s progressive prowess continues:
“The British military is one of several around the world that has sought advice from the IDF on equality, though the UK is unlikely to catch up in the short term, despite recent efforts to do so.”
Of course, none of this is new to those of us familiar with the rights afforded women (and gays) in the IDF, but I never thought I’d live to see the day when the Guardian’s “purity of ideology” would ever allow for such journalistic “treif” – unvarnished truth about Israel’s undeniably progressive nature.
“There are laws that demand women must be recruited to the IDF, and a series of legal challenges have shattered barriers to what they can do thereafter. The process started in 1949 with a law that demanded equality in the IDF – and 92% of roles in service are now open to women…Women now regularly serve in anti-aircraft brigades, in the artillery, and as fighter pilots.”
Again, contrasting the IDF with the British Armed Forces, Hopkins notes:
“In the UK, women remain banned from small units in the frontline because of fears that, in the heat of a battle, male colleagues may seek to look after them, rather than concentrate on fighting.”
We hope, of course, that the UK will continue to look to Israel for guidance regarding other gender equality issues and, further, that the Guardian uses this report as a teachable moment for their staff, thus ushering in a new Guardian era of (CP Scott-inspired) Zionist advocacy, and philo-Semitic commentary.
Yeah, I know, when non kosher animals grow wings!
- Zionist Svengali Alert: Guardian reader complains CiF Watch insidiously imposes its will on others (cifwatch.com)
- The moral equivalence game: David Wearing’s CiF essay on human rights abuses in Israel & Bahrain (cifwatch.com)
- Has the Guardian reached the tipping point in its crusade against Israel? (cifwatch.com)
- Overview of Guardian coverage of Israel: May 28th – June 30th 2012. (cifwatch.com)
- “Who benefits?” CiF contributor warns that military intervention in Syria would benefit Israel (cifwatch.com)
- The racism of no expectations: The Palestinians on the pages of the Guardian (A six month review) (cifwatch.com)
- Islamism, and the Guardian left’s moral complicity with explicit antisemitism (cifwatch.com)
- Blogger at The Independent evokes Nazi analogy, arguing Israel is based on “superior race theory” (cifwatch.com)
- Request to CiF Watch readers: Ask Guardian to remove Raed Salah’s ‘Jewish supremacism’ smear (cifwatch.com)
Categories: Category not assigned