Julian Borger, the diplomatic editor of the Guardian, published a story on Nov. 9 titled “Iran’s strike on US drone demonstrates the fragility of uneasy peace“.
Borger’s piece provided analysis on an incident earlier in the week in which two Iranian jet fighters fired at a US Predator drone which was carrying out a classified surveillance mission 16 miles off the Iranian shore.
While other analysts echoed Borger’s broader theme that the episode highlighted the risks that encounters between American and Iranian forces could quickly escalate into a military confrontation, you get a glimpse into Borger’s unique angle by reading the strap line:
Western officials warn that minority elements on both sides have vested interest in triggering ‘spoiler’ incident that leads to war
So, who are the “minority elements” hoping for an incident which triggers a war?
Borger writes the following:
“Western officials are concerned that minority elements on both sides of the confrontation in the region have a vested interest in triggering such a clash. Some Israeli leaders would like to see Washington drawn in so that superior US forces could strike a crippling blow to Iranian nuclear facilities, while a “war party” in Tehran sees a conflict as a means of rallying support for the regime and cracking down yet further on dissent, officials say.” [emphasis added]
While we’ll never know which Western officials he’s referring to, perhaps he’d like to ask them how Israel could have anything to do with decisions by the United States military to deploy surveillance drones over the Persian Gulf, or anywhere else in the world.
Even if you accept the premise that Israel has a “vested interest” in a US war with Iran, Borger’s suggestion relating to this latest incident seems to rest on nothing more than the classic non-sequitur: Who benefits?
America’s political leaders and US security agencies are the only parties dictating US security policy, so if there are “elements” hoping to provoke a confrontation with the regime in Tehran Mr. Borger may wish to look to Washington, D.C., and not Jerusalem, for answers.
- Guardian’s Julian Borger avoids reporting on most of Ahmadinejad’s UN speech (cifwatch.com)
- Guardian’s Julian Borger responds to CiF Watch, acknowledges error about genocide convention (cifwatch.com)
- Fact-checking Julian Borger on Ahmadinejad’s incitement to genocide (cifwatch.com)
- The Guardian: out-farcing FARS (cifwatch.com)
- In every generation: Guardian advances historically familiar refrain that Israel is ‘beating war drums’ (cifwatch.com)