Guardian

A Resounding Silence


My middle stepson is a few months older than Gilad Shalit but they joined the army around the same time. He completed his military service some time ago now and has already managed to take a long trip to Australia, New Zealand, India, Nepal and Thailand. Right now he is debating what to study at university (I’m in the philosophy and international relations camp but Dad is rooting for water engineering) and has just set up a home of his own with his lovely girlfriend. Every time he pops in to take something else to his new nest I remind myself how lucky we are that he is living a normal life and doing the things a twenty-four year old should be doing, unlike Gilad and his family.

Instead of browsing prospectuses for universities or donating towels and bedding to a new apartment, the Shalit family are at this moment walking to Jerusalem in the oppressive summer heat to try to raise awareness of the beginning of their son’s fifth year of captivity at the hands of Hamas. Tens of thousands of Israelis from all walks of life and from all over the country, most without any direct connection to Gilad, have joined them on their journey. Those unable to join the march have yellow ribbons and balloons tied to their cars, garden fences or handbags. Every family in this country is acutely aware of the fact that instead of Gilad it could easily have been their son who has been held without contact with the outside world for all these long years.


This nation is also engaged in painful debates about what should be done to speed up Gilad’s release. There is a real dilemma here, of which everyone is aware. The parent, brother or sister in each one of us wants to see Gilad blinking in the sunlight at last, swamped by the hugs of his family, and our instincts tell us to pay any price to make that happen. But we also know that in a way, Gilad is a victim of the fact that we have done exactly that in the past. We have released hundreds of terrorists from Israeli prisons just to bring one or two of our captured soldiers back home, even if they were no longer among the living. In doing so, maybe we unintentionally nurtured an environment in which it is worthwhile for terror groups to abduct Israeli soldiers and if we release the 1,000 prisoners which Hamas demand for Gilad’s freedom, maybe we are in fact laying the foundations for the kidnapping of the next Gilad.

When we send our eighteen-year-old sons and daughters to the army we comfort ourselves with the fact that no matter what, our country will do its best to make sure that they come home. We therefore expect our government to do everything in its power now to reunite the Shalit family. On the other hand, how are we to be capable of looking into the eyes of those hundreds of Israeli families whose loved ones were murdered by the same terrorists we are about to release? How can we snatch away from them the little sense they had that justice had been done when their relative’s murderer was tried, convicted and sentenced? I have no answers to these difficult questions; I really do not know what we should do because every side in this debate is right and whatever action we take, someone will be irreparably hurt.

There is, of course, another way. The cycle of the kidnapping of Israeli soldiers and the release of convicted terrorists in order to buy their freedom could be broken if Israel were not alone in this. If Human Rights organizations, foreign governments, the UN and the world’s liberal media were to put real and significant pressure on the terrorist groups responsible for the unlawful kidnapping of Israeli soldiers from inside Israel’s borders, these tragic events would stop.

Imagine if the UN announced tomorrow that it was suspending all UNWRA activities and funding in the Gaza Strip until Gilad Shalit was released. Imagine if the EU refused to allow imports of strawberries and flowers from Gaza until the Red Cross was granted regular access to Gilad in accordance with his rights under international law. Imagine if Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch or B’Tselem did more than release the occasional tepid statement. Imagine if the BBC and the Guardian actually reported this story with the same zeal and intensity as they invested in the kidnapping of Alan Johnston.

Last Friday marked the end of four years of Gilad Shalit’s captivity in Gaza in clear violation of his rights as a prisoner and as a human being. The Guardian has failed to report upon either this unhappy anniversary or the tens of thousands-strong march currently in progress right under the nose of its new Jerusalem correspondent. Can Harriet Sherwood really not see all those bright yellow balloons?

Why this resounding silence?



Categories: Guardian

Tagged as: ,

11 replies »

  1. Israelinurse, I can understand the aching sense of thankfulness that your stepson is not in Gilad Shalit’s shoes, and the “there but for G-d’s grace…” I can only begin to imagine how Gilad’s parents might be feeling.

    As for the Guardian, well, we cannot expect an ounce of humanity from it. The morons below the line have answered in the past that Israel holds thousands of Palestinians in captivity so why all the fuss about one Israeli? What of course they don’t tell us (and probably because they are ignorant of it, or more likely ignorant generally) is that Palestinian prisoners have visits, good food, are not kept in solitary confinement and even, as in the case of Sami Kuntar, are allowed to study for university qualifications.

    For myself, I am heartily sick of this double standard. I believe that Israel should cut back on visitor privileges (nothing but Red Cross) for all these prisoners and certainly no studies at the Israeli taxpayers’ expense until Gilad is freed, and may that be soon.

    I worry for his mental, as well as his physical health.

    We can expect little different from animals which bring up their own children to want to die.

  2. “…The cycle of the kidnapping of Israeli soldiers and the release of convicted terrorists in order to buy their freedom could be broken if Israel were not alone in this. If Human Rights organizations, foreign governments, the UN and the world’s liberal media were to put real and significant pressure on the terrorist groups responsible for the unlawful kidnapping of Israeli soldiers from inside Israel’s borders, these tragic events would stop….”

    I have written on Mark Gardner’s blog about the inversion of reality which is in place as regards this. We have to MAKE this happen – it won’t just happen by magic, which is, I suspect, what the Israeli government is hoping.

    How do we make it happen? As I said on the other thread, the Islamist devil seems to have all the best tunes at the moment.

  3. The scope of the campaign to have Shilad returned is pretty unprecedented, i.e. on a global/historical scale.

    The fourth “anniversary” certainly deserves media attention – because of its importance to the Israelis, which has all manner of effects on the country’s politics. Plus there’s the human issue, of course – which likewise is part of the context when it comes to I/P.

  4. We need to fund raise for, yes, advertising campaigns, (including in the Groan which must be so desperate for advertising revenue that it would probably accept it) to keep putting out the counter information.

  5. I will be at the FZY-organised Vigil For Gilad in London today – 10 until 6 every day until Sunday (not Shabbat), opposite Downing Street

  6. On the anniversary of the London 7/7 bombing, Cif published three repugnant articles whining about how the attack had affected British Muslims.

    Not a word was written about the the dead and injured, and the effect on the families that still miss them.

    This is the Guardian’s way. Their silence on Gilad Shalit is entirely consistent with their treatment of all the victims of Islamofascism.

  7. pretzelberg – actually, I think the campaign needs to be ramped up, and should include a daily vigil outside the UN. There are enough Jews in NY that organizing a daily vigil of 20 or so there should not be a problem, and if anyone reading this could get that ball rolling it would be a good thing.

    We had a small demonstration outside the White House a few weeks ago – perhaps we need to set this up in DC, but the US is not, in this case, the proper address.

  8. Actually, writing this has given me an idea – perhaps we could organize a vigil outside the American Red Cross headquarters in DC.

    For lack of a better e-mail at this point, you could e-mail a question to:

    socialmedia@usa.redcross.org

    asking what the American Red Cross is doing about Gilad Shalit.

  9. Here are some more e-mails for the American red Cross:

    socialmedia@usa.redcross.org; governmentrelations@usa.redcross.org; CongressionalRelations@usa.redcross.org; FederalRelations@usa.redcross.org

    If you are in the USA, send them a short message – and if you are somewhere else, look up your local Red Cross headquarters and send them a short message?

    E.g.:

    What is the [your local] Red Cross doing to ensure that Gilad Shalit is treated according to the Geneva Conventions, and is being properly treated and receiving assistance from the Red Cross?