Anti-Israel hatefest season kicks off

This is cross posted from Richard Millett’s Blog

Last wednesday I went to hear two pro-Hamas supporters give a talk to a group of revolutionary communists at a London pub. The subject of the talk was “Ten years of Intifada – What Future for Palestine?”.

I cleared it with the pub manager beforehand so I wasn’t barred as happened to me when I tried to attend a Middle East Monitor meeting at the House of Commons in July.

Seems our pubs are more democratic than Parliament.

When I entered the room the front table was adorned with a “Victory to the Intifada” banner and the banner next to me read “Boycott Marks and Spencer”.

The chairperson opened the meeting by telling us how M&S was closely entwined with the growing of the Zionist project and how past M&S directors had made many racist statements.

The two speakers, Ghassan Abu-Sitta, a Palestinian surgeon, and Manal Masalha, a Palestinian activist and PhD student, spent the next hour basically telling us how Fatah/PLO had sold out to the racist imperialists and Zionists.

Fatah had, apparently, now conspired in the Zionist project via the Oslo peace accords and will eventually either agree future landswaps with Israel so that Israeli Palestinians will be transferred to a new Palestinian state or there will be an outright ethnic cleansing of Israeli Palestinians.

What was needed was a national liberation movement and although Hamas was far from perfect (Abu-Sitta acknowledged that Hamas demolishes Palestinian houses which don’t have permits) it was the only organisation capable of doing what was necessary to free the Palestinian people.

We were told that during the Oslo peace process the Palestinians were offered only 42% of the West Bank and 60% of Gaza and that Israeli Palestinians live in Israel under laws reminiscent of the Nazis

During the Q&A a Sri Lankan man asked whether Hamas should be either more democratic in its behaviour or step aside. He compared Hamas to the Tamil Tigers who, he felt, had caused chaos in Sri Lanka and that Sri Lanka was now benefitting from their demise.

Abu-Sitta disagreed and told us just how democratic Hamas is and how it had gone along with the Oslo Accords until Fatah had finally sold out the Palestinian cause.

I didn’t want to complicate issues by mentioning Hamas suicide bombers walking into Israeli restaurants to blow up families who were at lunch.

I kept it simple and asked:

“If the Palestinians were offered 100% of the West Bank and Gaza for a Palestinian state and the Israeli Palestinians living in Israel could stay put, wasn’t peace better achieved that way than continuing the Palestinian struggle?”

Abu-Sitta said that is impossible as Zionism is incompatible with peace.

Some of the audience then praised the smashEDO protesters in Brighton and the protesters that constantly harass Ahava but United Against Fascism came in for criticism for their statement on their website that “‘UAF does not have a position on the question of Israel and Palestine’ when it should have”!

Ok, so this meeting was above a pub and there were only 20 people there but the statements made are not too disimilar from those made at the many anti-Israel events that take place throughout the year.

This meeting kicked off the post summer anti-Israel hatefest season with conferences galore already arranged where anti-Israel activists can devote disproportionate amounts of their time to giving a good, hard kicking to the Jewish state.

Next up this tuesday is a Palestine Campaign event at the House of Commons entitled Ending the siege on Gaza – Eyewitness reports from the Viva Palestina convoy, Parliamentary delegations, and Westminster University Architects.

Then on 20th and 21st November there is a disgraceful two day conference at the Law Society, of all places, entitled International corporate complicity in Israel’s Violations of International Human Rights Law, International Humanitarian Law, and War Crimes.

Hilariously, the conference is taking the form of a jury trial. I wonder whether Israel will be acquitted or not. Answers on a postcard please.

And on December 1st Middle East Monitor is presenting Professor Richard Falk, United Nations Special Rapporteur for Palestinian Human Rights, who is going to speak on The Israeli assault on human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

All this before Israel Apartheid Week in the new year!

There really are few places like the UK it when it comes to the amount of opportunities to express one’s hatred for the Jewish state.

These organisations would, no doubt, offer an invitation to President Ahmadinejad if our authorities would only allow him to come to these shores.

7 replies »

  1. What did you expect? AlthoughI admire your guts for going into the lion’s den, at the moment you are pissing against the wind.

    Fortunately Israel is quite capable militarily, economically and socially to weather this nonesense and perhaps it would be best to leave our enemies to vent their useless rhetoric to their fellow-travellers. At least that way they are left talking to themselves!

    By the way, I have just returned from a visit to Israel and it was absolutely heaving with tourists (mainly non-Jewish) from all over the world. The hotels were full and the roads jammed with tourist buses – so I wouldn’t worry too much about talk of boycotts!

  2. Islamists in pubs????

    Whatever next, boozy lock-ins???

    (Nothing should surprise us given that the peace loving Quakers rent out their premises to supporters of Islamist terror).

  3. I find Richard’s reports from the field extremely useful whenever the “they are paranoid” accusation crops up.

  4. Its always interesting to see the contortions that the Communists (such as they are these days) go through – who could ever have imagined a Communist group aligning itself with Islamic fascists??? In a pub!!

    We live in interesting times.

    But as MazalUK says – Israel is strong enough to get past this sort of nonsense.

    “revolutionary communists” – ha, ha!!

  5. I kept it simple and asked:

    “If the Palestinians were offered 100% of the West Bank and Gaza for a Palestinian state and the Israeli Palestinians living in Israel could stay put, wasn’t peace better achieved that way than continuing the Palestinian struggle?”

    What a dishonest question! And BTW what were Abu Sitta’s EXACT words in his reply?

  6. I am assuming that you are joking, but just in case you aren’t:

    Why was the question dishonest, and even if it were, it’s surely no more dishonest than much of the guff put out by the Islamist supporting left here in the UK. It was a perfectly reasonable question although it assumed too much – ie that the person to whom it was addressed was a thinking individual rather than a mouthpiece.

    And why do you need to know the “exact words?” Do you have difficulty in believing Richard Millet’s account or that Hamas-supporters could possibly answer in this way? The answer Richard has quoted is typical al-taqiyya-type deflection resorted to whenever an Islamist is backed into a corner. If he answered honestly (assuming of course that he knew how to do that) there’d be howls of outrage from his brothers, so he behaves what he knows by changing the subject and hoping his audience won’t notice.

    It didn’t work though, did it?