A guest post by AKUS
Something strange is happening at the Washington Post.
Famous for its investigative reporting ever since the Watergate affair, now, when reporting on Israel, it seems to have become strikingly similar in content and tone to the Guardian. As we know, the Guardian recently won Honest Reporting’s 2011 ‘Dishonest Reporting’ Award and the Washington Post seem to be on its way to becoming a serious candidate for the same “honor” next year.
Take the recent story in the Washington Post about Israel’s use of drones over Gaza to identify terrorist activity.
The web version appears at: In Gaza, lives shaped by drones.
The print edition ran as a front page, above-the –fold news story. In fact, it occupied almost the entire front page, which is quite unusual for an article that does not contain breaking news or an investigative report. Since this area is the first thing readers see when they pick up the paper editors will reserve that space for their most important stories. This is what it looked like in the print version, under the very different headline: DRONES CAST A PALL OF FEAR”. The story ran for another two full pages inside the paper: Here, here and here.
The article and web version are eerily reminiscent of the Guardian’s reporting. The entire article focuses entirely on the attitudes of seemingly peaceful Gazans going about the normal things people do – going to cafes, driving their cars, jogging. There is a little map to show where the drones are supposed to originate from, and on the web there is a video clip of a drone with the legalistic caption “a third-party video that has not been independently verified by The Washington Post” and a gallery of pictures intended to show drones and their effects.
The article includes casually misrepresentative “facts” provided by one side only, with no attempt at obtaining an Israeli version of the information provided:
The Palestinian Center for Human Rights says 825 people have been killed by drones in Gaza since the capture of Shalit, who was released in October. Most of those killed, according to the organization, have been civilians mistakenly targeted or caught in the deadly shrapnel shower of a drone strike.
In fact, it is doubtful that anyone has been killed by an Israeli drone since Israel’s drones are, apparently, as the Gazans in the video clip say, small unarmed reconnaissance vehicles. Like the one shown in the web version of this story:
When an Israeli strike is carried out it is carried out by a plane or helicopter piloted by a human being who has the authority to abort the mission if he or she believes it will endanger civilians not connected with the terrorist activity. Israel makes extraordinary efforts to avoid killing civilians despite the fact that Hamas and other terrorists deliberately operate from residential areas while firing missiles into Israel.
Interestingly, Scott Wilson, who authored this article and whose approach to the conflict is eerily similar to that of the Guardian’s Harriet Sherwood, threw in this follow-on comment:
By comparison, the New America Foundation says U.S. drones have killed at least 1,807 militants and civilians in Pakistan since 2006.
Suffice it to say that I have never seen a full-page article about “the pall of fear” in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, or elsewhere that US drones operate. It is worth noting that according to the dates provided, over the same 5 year period US drones, which are far larger than Israeli drones and are weaponized, are claimed by a US source to have killed more than twice as many people in only one of the countries in which the US is operating against groups similar to Hamas. The overall total must be higher.
On the same front page of the Washington Post, two stories that should be of far greater interest to the US reader are literally pushed to the side – Herman Cain’s resignation from the presidential race, and the ongoing issue of illegal immigration and border arrests.
As it happened, another drone story surfaced shortly afterwards – the downing or crash of a US drone in Iran. This drone story first appeared in a side column above the fold on the front page.
While there have been numerous follow-up report in the Post about this issue, including Obama’s abject request for the Iranians to return the drone, none of the reports discuss US drones “spreading a pall of fear” over any country in which they fly. In fact, quite rightly in my opinion, drones are regarded as a relatively low-cost, effective way to prosecute a campaign against distributed terror organization hiding out in inaccessible regions. However there are no articles that seriously suggest, for example, that the US should not be over flying and killing people in countries with which it is not technically at war, while Israeli surveillance activity over Gaza, from where rocket are fired daily into Israel, is clearly being portrayed as illegitimate by Scott Wilson.
The Washington Post has also become adept at picking up the same negative stories about Israel, probably from the same Arab sources, that the Guardian publishes day after day.
For example, Joel Greenberg wrote an article that clearly derives from the same source as Harriet Sherwood’s article about relocating the Bedouin near Maale Adumim. (The Bedouin have become the new front in the media war to delegitimize Israel).
Read Sherwood’s article, Israel to forcibly remove bedouin communities in settlements push and compare it with Greenberg’s report on the same matter: Israeli plan to move West Bank Bedouin stirs controversy .
While not word for word, and more nuanced than Sherwood’s even in the headline, the thrust of the article is the same and the “facts” reported are clearly rewrites of material from the same source – almost certainly a Palestinian or anti-Israeli NGO organization, or, as cited by Greenberg, UNRWA, which now appears to regard Bedouin as having being transmuted into “Palestinian refugees” in its never-ending efforts to justify and expand its unique role in creating ever more refugees, generation after generation.
There are slight differences in the language but the overall “facts” presented are the same.
Israel’s claim that moving people squatting in shacks to areas where there is electricity, running water and sewage facilities is scornfully cast aside in favor of a clear implication that this is ethnic cleansing, backed up by uncorroborated claims of such from unnamed “UN agencies in the West Bank” other than UNRWA (Greenberg) and, of course, various “human rights groups”.
In both cases, there is a clear implication that connecting Maale Adumim to greater Jerusalem will bisect the West Bank, which is, of course not true. There will still be a corridor of about 15 km between Maale Adumim and the Jordan Valley – about the same width as Israel at its narrowest point opposite the West bank.
The same story about a school built of old tires appears in the text of Sherwood’s article and as a caption to a video clip on the Washington Post’s web version of the story. In both articles, the idea that people should not simply squat wherever they wish, something that is not tolerated in the US or the UK, is never mentioned. Instead, a sense of some historical right to do so is invoked and the destruction of a noble nomadic culture is implied.
The coverage of Israel in the Washington Post is becoming increasingly and obsessively negative, as is the Guardian’s. Here is a short list of articles just by Joel Greenberg, who seems to be a combination of the Guardian’s Sherwood and their new reporter from Ramallah, Phoebe Greenwood.
Each of these stories appearing once or twice a week portrays Israel in a negative way or a manner that may raise concern about Israel’s action with subtle bias in the choice of language, rather as Henry Silverman has shown Reuters does:
- On Israel’s uneasy border with Egypt, a fence rises DEC 2
- Israel to release withheld tax funds to Palestinians NOV 30
- In Israel, concerns about stifling of dissent NOV 26
- In the West Bank, a contested heritage NOV 21
- Palestinian ‘Freedom Riders’ arrested on bus to Jerusalem NOV 15
- Barak plays down cost of possible Israeli strike on Iran NOV 8
- Young Palestinian activists represent a potential new political and social force NOV 4
- In Israel, speculation grows about Iran strike NOV 3
The articles the Washington Post publishes about Israel are unlike those it reports about any other country, just as we have seen with the Guardian.
Something is happening at the Washington Post, one of the world’s most influential newspapers situated in the heart of the US capital, and it bears watching.
- Harriet Sherwood’s report on Bedouin copy-pastes UNRWA anti-Israel propaganda (cifwatch.com)
- The Guardian: Geographically Clueless (cifwatch.com)
- Harriet Sherwood’s latest Guardian report on terror attacks from Gaza redefines the word “Sporadic” (cifwatch.com)
- Guardian gratuitous anti-Israel photo of the day (& a story about the photojournalist behind the lens) (cifwatch.com)
- How Guardian writers file stories about life in Gaza without mentioning Hamas, without really trying (cifwatch.com)
- Palestinian Guardian propaganda photo of the day (Soldier vs. child) (cifwatch.com)
- Harriet Sherwood legitimizes Gazans’ complaints that they can’t enter Israel to sue the Jewish state (cifwatch.com)
- How the Guardian downplays terrorist attack on innocent Israelis (cifwatch.com)