Guardian

The Guardian: Where Jews are “hardline”, while Hamas tries to ‘rein in extremists’.


In an April 7 post, we asked how many of the roughly 800 Jews currently living in the ancient city of Hebron Harriet Sherwood had spoken to or interviewed.  Our interest in the Guardian Jerusalem correspondent’s familiarity with Hebron’s Jews was piqued by the following sentence in her April 4 report about an outbreak of violence in the West Bank – including in Israelis cities such as Hebron.

After the funeral Palestinian youths threw stones at Israeli soldiers close to an extremist Jewish settlement in the heart of the city. The Israeli military responded with teargas, stun grenades and rubber bullets

We noted that by referring to a community of hundreds of Israelis as “extremists”, Sherwood was lazily imputing widespread fanaticism without evidence – and, more broadly, conveying a message that there’s something radical or extreme about the desire to maintain even a small Jewish presence in Hebron, the oldest Jewish community in the world.

Our April 7 post is relevant in contextualizing Sherwood’s report on today’s terrorist attack in the West Bank – in which a Palestinian stabbed an Israeli man to death, then grabbed his weapon and fired at nearby border police.

Sherwood begins her piece, entitled ‘Israeli security forces deployed in West Bank after settler is stabbed to death‘, April 30, with the following information, which includes a curious reference to the victim’s home town:

Large numbers of Israeli security forces have been deployed in the West Bank after an Israeli settler was stabbed to death by a Palestinian amid fears that the killing could trigger widespread confrontations.

Eviatar Borovzky, 30, a father of five children and a part-time security guard at the hardline settlement of Yitzhar, near Nablus, died of his wounds at the scene of the attack.

Even if the contention that some Jews who live in Yitzhar are “hardline” has merit, it’s unclear what significance the politics of the victim’s home city has in understanding the attack, anymore than the fact that the terrorist suspect is reportedly from a city (Tulkarem) where several deadly terrorist attacks have originated would have relevance.

Sherwood’s report also included the following:

Around the same time [as the attack on Borovzky],an Israeli air strike killed an alleged Palestinian militant in Gaza in the first targeted assassination since the eight-day war last November. The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) said Haitham Masshal, 24, had been involved in a recent rocket attack on the Israeli Red Sea resort of Eilat. It described him as a “Global-Jihad-affiliated terrorist” and said he had “acted in different Jihad Salafi terror organisations and over the past few years has been a key terror figure”.

Hamas, the Islamist organisation which controls Gaza, has observed the ceasefire agreement that ended November’s conflict. However, in the past two months there has been renewed intermittent rocket fire from Gaza into Israel, blamed on small extremist organisations that Hamas is trying to rein in.

So, according to Sherwood, Hamas is trying to “rein in” extremism in Gaza.

Briefly:

  • Hamas is recognized as a terrorist movement by the US, EU, Canada, Japan, the U.K., and Australia.
  • Hamas’s founding charter cites the wisdom of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion to “prove” that Jews are indeed trying to take over the world.
  • Hamas has carried out hundreds of deadly terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians.
  • Hamas leaders have called for genocide against the Jews.

Regarding the final bullet point, here’s one example: Mahmoud al-Zahar, a senior leader and co-founder of Hamas, is seen in this video waxing eloquently (on Al-Aqsa TV in 2010) about the the Jews’ future in the Middle East:

No, there’s clearly nothing “extremist” or “hardline” about that!

13 replies »

  1. I’m waiting for that racist wolf in libertarian sheep’s clothing, ashley george, to tell us how blood-thirsty, anti-Semitic demagogues like Al Zahar represent everything that is good and just in his/her anti-racist utopian dream, and how the existence of the ‘racist Zionist entity’ prevents Al-Zahar’s genocidal vision from becoming the perfect reality.

  2. Apart from the disgustingness highlighted by Adam Sherwoodenhead hasn’t the basic decency to call the innocent victim Mr Borovzky.

    At least she put this in:

    Following Tuesday’s attack, Yariv Levin, the chairman of Israel’s governing coalition, said it was “the Palestinian response to John Kerry’s new peace initiatives”. Avi Roeh, of the Yesha Council, which represent settlers, said that “history proves that talk of concessions is the biggest producer of terror attack”.

  3. In the video, when the cell phone rung while al-Zahar was speaking, I’m surprised he didn’t immediately blame the Jews for the technology that interrupted his thoughtful speech.

  4. Kudos to Adam for showing what a liar and Islamo appeaser Sherwood is.

    So, according to Sherwood, Hamas is trying to “rein in” extremism in Gaza.

    Briefly:

    Hamas is recognized as a terrorist movement by the US, EU, Canada, Japan, the U.K., and Australia.
    Hamas’s founding charter cites the wisdom of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion to “prove” that Jews are indeed trying to take over the world.
    Hamas has carried out hundreds of deadly terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians.
    Hamas leaders have called for genocide against the Jews.
    Regarding the final bullet point, here’s one example: Mahmoud al-Zahar, a senior leader and co-founder of Hamas, is seen in this video waxing eloquently (on Al-Aqsa TV in 2010) about the the Jews’ future in the Middle East:

  5. Hamas has fired 14,000 missiles at Israeli civilians since 05.
    If Germany was firing thousands of missiles at England, i doubt the Guardian would be calling Germany moderate.
    Hamas is a fascist racist organization that fires missiles behind civilians at Israeli civilians, and enjoys slaughtering Israeli families.
    The Guardian has now shown it is in bed with Islamo Nazis.

    Thursday, March 21, 2013

    Hamas’ official position paper on the destruction of Israel
    Khaled Meshal, Hamas’ “political” leader who is touted as being more moderate than his colleagues in Gaza, has published a major position paper for Hamas to explain its political positions.

    It adds very little to what we already knew.

    The paper lists nineteen positions, which include:

    1. Palestine from the river to the sea, and from north to south, is a land of the Palestinian people and its homeland and its legitimate right, we may not a waiver an inch or any part thereof, no matter what the reasons and circumstances and pressures.

    2. Palestine – all of Palestine – is a land of Islamic and Arab affiliation, a blessed sacred land, that has a major portion in the heart of every Arab and Muslim

    3. No recognition of the legitimacy of the occupation whatever; this is a principled position, political and moral, and therefore do not recognize the legitimacy of the Israeli occupation of Palestine, and recognition of “Israel” and the legitimacy of its presence on any part of Palestine no matter how long; nand it will not be long, God willing.

    4. Liberation of Palestine is a national duty; it is the responsibility of the Palestinian people and the Arab and Islamic nation, it is also a humanitarian responsibility in accordance with the requirements of truth and justice.

    5. Jihad and the armed resistance is the right and real method for the liberation of Palestine, and the restoration of all the rights, together with, of course, all forms of political and diplomatic struggle including in the media, public and legal [spheres]; with the need to mobilize all the energies of the nation in the battle

    6. Resistance is a means and not an end, if we have another way without blood and painful sacrifices to liberate the land and ending the occupation and the restoration of rights we would take it, but history proves that there is no option to expel the occupiers and restore the land and rights without using all forms of resistance, led by armed resistance.

    7. We are not fighting Jews because they are Jews, but are fighting the Zionist Jews occupiers, the aggressors, and we will fight anyone who tries to attack us or usurp our rights or occupy our land, regardless of religion or affiliation, race or nationality.

    8. The Zionist project is a racist project based on murder and terrorism, and so it is the enemy of the Palestinian people and the nation, and is a real threat to them, and a huge threat to its security and interests, and it is not an exaggeration to say that it is a danger to the security of the humanitarian community and the interests and stability.

    9. Jerusalem is an Islamic and Christian [holy place], we many not give it up not relinquish any part of it, it is our right and our spirit, our history, our present and our future, which is the capital of Palestine, and dearest to the hearts of Arabs and Muslims…. Israel has no legitimacy and no right to to Jerusalem at all, nor any legitimacy nor right to all of Palestine. And all actions of Israel in Jerusalem to Judaize and settle and falsification of facts and attempts to fabricate history are void.

    10. Upholding the right of return of Palestinian refugees and displaced persons to their homes from which they were expelled, or were prevented from returning, both in the occupied territories in 1948 or 1967, to all of Palestine; we refuse to compromise in any way for this right. At the same time reject all settlement projects or alternative homelands…. [some detail on how people proposed Lebanon or Jordan or the Sinai as alternate homelands]

    11. The unity of the Palestinian land: The West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip and the occupied land of 1948, one land with all its geography, it is one unit, not part separated from the other, which is a whole nation of the Palestinian people. The situation in Gaza now is exceptional and imposed on us, and not a natural situation, we can not accept that Gaza is separate…

    12. And the unity of the Palestinian people Muslims and Christians, and all its intellectual, political and ideological components, and with all the strength and factions, militant and political.

    13. The unity of the Palestinian political system and its institutions, and national unity of his authority through the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), which needs to be rebuilt on valid grounds, to include all the Palestinian forces and components. …

    14. …The state is the real first fruit of liberation; there is no alternative to the establishment of a Palestinian state, with real sovereignty over the entire territory.

    15. [True] Palestinian national independence: a principle which is based on the non-dependence on any country or party in the world; friend or an ally or an enemy or opponent. But that does not mean that we …are weakening the Arab and Islamic role, Palestine was and will remain Arab and Islamic, but also a humanitarian issue.

    16. Institution-building and the Palestinian National authorities should always be on the basis of democracy, and in the forefront of free and fair elections, equal opportunities….

    17. Non-interference in the affairs of other countries, and not to engage in themes and conflicts and alignments between nations….

    18. The unity of the nation with all its components, ethnic and religious, we are one nation…

    19. Any position or a political programs or tactical initiatives or must be in line with the Palestinian national principle that we have mentioned….therefore we reject any draft agreements or settlements that diminish those principles, principles affecting Palestinian national rights.
    There’s more, including more about “resistance,” but the point is that these principles have been clearly communicated before – the utter rejection of Israel or Jewish rights to any land now and forever and the decision never to abandon terrorism.

    Yet Western analysts continue to believe that Hamas is moderating – because it says that if the Jews can be forced out of their land without blood, Hamas would happily allow them to leave.

    The amount of self-deception (or, sometimes, just deception) about Hamas in the West is unconscionable. Their policy is right here, multi-layered, in black and white, and it leaves no room for Jewish national rights.

    Anyone who says that Israel must make temporary accommodations with a Hamas that is sworn to utterly destroy Israel simply helps Hamas achieve its goal.

    There is one interesting omission here, though. In the past Hamas was more upfront about the ultimate goal – an Islamic caliphate that encompasses the entire Middle East. But in a manifesto meant to destroy Israel, emphasizing that goal would water down the message. Save that for phase 2 of the strategy.

    It is worth emphasizing that the Islamists think in terms of centuries, not election cycles. This is a true strategy, and they are patient. To them, the Crusades were a century-long blip, and the existence of Israel is even less permanent than that. This is why all concessions are welcomed by Hamas without their giving up anything – because every little bit adds up over time.

  6. Sherwood saying Hamas is trying to “rein in” extremism in Gaza is like saying Saddam Hussein is trying to reign in Chemical Ali.

  7. A very interesting and well research critique of the HAMAS position. Why does HAMAS think these Palestinians have the right of return to somebody else’s country. I sounds bonkers.

  8. The PA is no.better. Their leaders routinely mention The Protocols and teach it o children.

    Fatah might be slightly less murderous than Hamas at the minute, but they work to the same goal. Killing Jews.