General Antisemitism

Jewish Daily Forward ‘Top 50’ list includes “journalist” who promotes antisemitism

The Jewish Daily Forward 2013 ‘Top 50‘ represents their annual survey of the 50 men and women who’ve made “a significant impact on the Jewish story” over the past year, and is informed by “rules require that every one is an American citizen whose actions speak with a Jewish inflection”.  Their 2013 list includes such prolific Jewish voices as Philip Roth and Ruth Wisse – as well as a former Guardian columnist we’ve commented on quite frequently: 


Their selection of Glenn Greenwald is explained thusly:

The biggest story of 2013, and possibly the decade, has been the exposure of the National Security Agency’s domestic and international surveillance program, including the extent of intelligence-sharing between America and Israel. At the center of this story — its conduit — is Glenn Greenwald.

As a columnist for the Guardian, Greenwald came into contact with the NSA security contractor Edward Snowden in May. Snowden was ready to reveal the extent of the agency’s spying, and Greenwald’s first story ran on June 6. At that point, Greenwald became the world’s most important journalist — though some question whether he is a journalist or an advocate.

Greenwald, 46, is based in Brazil, where he lives with his partner, but he grew up in New York and Florida and worked as a constitutional and civil rights lawyer before he started a blog in 2005 and saw his career take off.

Though his fame over the past year has been due to the NSA revelations, Greenwald’s columns, at Salon and the Guardian, frequently dealt with Israel in a critical way

Whilst the far-left orientation of the paper, which once ran a glowing profile of a prolific opponent of Israel’s continued existence known as Ali Abunimah, at least partly explains the honor they bestowed to Greenwald, their characterization of his politics as ‘critical of Israel’ represents a simply egregious deception.  

As we’ve demonstrated continually, it is not at all an exaggeration to characterize Greenwald’s hostility to Israel (and the U.S.) as similar to the hate rhetoric of Islamist extremists – a fact which may in part explain Greenwald’s defense of Hamas, Hezbollah and even, on at least one occasion, an American Al Qaeda operative.

Additionally, to get a sense of The Jewish Daily Forward’s ideological airbrush of Greenwald – employing the Guardian tactic of characterizing commentators who engage in antisemitism as merely “critical of Israel” – here is a collection passages from his columns which ‘deal with Jews in a critical way‘.

  • Large and extremely influential Jewish donor groups are the ones agitating for a US war against Iran, and that is the case because those groups are devoted to promoting Israel’s interests.” – Feb. 3, 2007, Unclaimed Territory
  • “The dominant narrative among neocons and the media is that, deep down in his heart, [Obama] may be insufficiently devoted to Israel to be president of the United States. Has there ever been another country to which American politicians were required to pledge their uncritical, absolute loyalty the way they are, now, with Israel?”  May 13, 2008 Salon
  • If you don’t…pledge your loyalty to our policies toward Israel and to Israel, what will happen to you is what just happened to Charles Freeman. You’ll be demonized and have your career ended.” – Jan. 8, 2009, interview on Hugh Hewitt  Show
  • “Those [American Jews] who favor the attack on Gaza are certainly guilty…of such overwhelming emotional and cultural attachment to Israel and Israelis that they long ago ceased viewing this conflict with any remnant of objectivity.” – Jan. 4, 2009 Salon
  • “So absolute has the Israel-centric stranglehold on American policy been that the U.S. Government has made it illegal to broadcast Hezbollah television stations and has even devoted its resources to criminally prosecuting and imprisoning satellite providers merely for including Hezbollah’s Al Manar channel in their cable package.  Not even our Constitution’s First Amendment has been a match for the endless exploitation of American policy, law and resources to target and punish Israel’s enemies.” – March 9, 2009, Salon
  • The real goal [of the Israel lobby], as always, was to ensure that there is no debate over America’s indescribably self-destructive, blind support for Israeli actions. [Charles] Freeman’s critics may have scored a short-term victory in that regard, but the more obvious it becomes what is really driving these scandals, the more difficult it will be to maintain this suffocating control over American debates and American policy.” – March 11, 2009 Salon
  • “The point is that the power the [Israel lobby] exercises [is] harmful in the extreme. They use it to squelch debate, destroy the careers and reputations of those who deviate from their orthodoxies, and compel both political parties to maintain strict adherence to an agenda that is held by a minority of Americans; that is principally concerned with the interests of a foreign country; and that results in serious cost and harm to the United States. In doing so, they insure not only that our policies towards Israel remain firmly in place no matter the outcome of our elections, but also that those policies remain beyond the realm of what can be questioned or debated by those who want to have a political future.” – March 11, 2009 Salon
  • “[Charles] Freeman is being dragged through the mud by the standard cast of accusatory Israel-centric neocons (Marty Peretz, Jon Chait, Jeffrey Goldberg, Commentary, The Weekly Standard’s Michael Goldfarb, etc. etc., etc.).” –March 9, 2009 Salon
  • “Meanwhile, one of the many Israel-Firsters in the U.S. Congress — Rep. Anthony Weiner, last seen lambasting President Obama for daring to publicly mention a difference between the U.S. and Israel — today not only defended Israel’s attack. – June 1, 2010 Salon
  • This is a truly disgusting spectacle…commentators — all of whom are writing well within the range of mainstream opinion on Israel — are being publicly smeared early in their careers as anti-Semites as part of a coordinated, ongoing campaign planned by Josh Block and carried out by numerous journalists with large media platforms, and aided and abetted by Jewish groups trading on their credibility to suppress debate. – Jan 19, 2012 Salon

On The Jewish Daily Forward’s history page, we are told that the paper (which originally launched as a Yiddish-language daily in 1897) has fought, over the years, for social justice, and has been “among the nation’s most eloquent defenders of democracy and Jewish rights.”

So, perhaps the paper’s editor, Jane Eisner, can explain how they can reconcile their commitment to promoting social justice and defending Jewish rights with their decision to honor an extreme ideologue who trades in explicitly racist narratives about the injurious influence of ‘disloyal’ American Jews on the body politic.

13 replies »

  1. ” Greenwald’s columns, at Salon and the Guardian, frequently dealt with Israel in a critical way. ”

    I believe there is a sense of scale missing here. Israel has been able to shadow herself behind the truly ghastly destruction wrought by the UK and the US in the ME for the last generation. None the less for many, even though their activities have been far more justifiable in terms of provocation than the UK and the US , it is still a country that has to be dealt with in a critical way . That’s what ” journalists ” do

    Greenwald is the best known journalist in the world following the NSA revelations and deservedly so.

    • “Greenwald is the best known journalist in the world following the NSA revelations and deservedly so”

      Being the ‘best known’ does not necessarily indicate a positive opinion.

      “deservedly so” Why?

      • ” Why? ”

        The lovely joke is that the NSA is the only branch of government that really listens to the people. Greenwald is smart , fluent and really hard working, his articles are properly researched and virtually impossible to argue with …hence the smears, half truths , misquotes and implications. Hence this article… people are worried and rightly so.

        • “people are worried and rightly so.”

          So you do believe something bad will happen as a result of Glen’s actions?

        • “Greenwald is smart , fluent and really hard working, his articles are properly researched and virtually impossible to argue with”

          You bet.

  2. Please don’t forget the fact that people like GG speak in two tongue’s depending on who the audience is. This has become normal. Strangely the rule of double speak which they accuse others of does not apply to them. Like Arab radicals GG and the Left calibrate their messages. Imagine a right wing journalist who spoke a neo-fascist party meets. As GG does when he is an annual guest at the US Socialism conference, speaking in front of 75 people at times.It would be like Krauthammer holding a speech at a KKK cross burning. Yet nobody in the MSM cares to point this out.
    I have also heard GG in TV interviews give sweeping absolution to Iran. This despite Iran’s proven meddling in a dozen Middle East countries. From troops on the ground in Syria to training entire sub-fascist guerilla armies in Lebanon complete with the supply of long range missiles aimed at Tel Aviv. The public hanging of gays is my personal favorite in this constellation.

    I think that the Left’s logic in Europe during the 30’s must have been similar. As Stalin is conducting mass murder cleanses in Russia the Left rallies around Spain and a section of the International Brigade is true to Stalin as they fight Franco’s thugs who enjoy the Nazi’s bomber support. All this confusion is then paper mache’d over with “human rights”. That an American can seek asylum in Putin’s post Grosny Russia under the heading of Human Rights is eerie.

    • Nothing can justify the alignment between the radical extreme left (Greenwald), and extremist Islam. The Guardian promotes Hamas and Hezbollah thugs and, when criticised, responds that it is presenting alternative views. Yet never an article/post by a BNP member. Even an EDL member.

      Or UKIP member either.

      So much for Guardian ‘fair and balanced’.

  3. Forgive my ignorance – I am not a reader of the Jewish Daily Forward, but from your description of the list – “the 50 men and women who’ve made “a significant impact on the Jewish story” over the past year” – it doesn’t sound like it’s an “honour” or necessarily praiseworthy to be included on this list.

    I would agree that Greenwald has made a pretty significant impact on the Jewish story in the last 12 months. It just hasn’t been a positive impact. It’s somewhat analagous to Time magazine making Hitler “Man of the Year” in 1938 (or whenever it was). Love him or loathe him, he was undoubtedly the most significant global figure of that year.

    Does the list (or previous versions thereof) contain other “baddies”?

    • When ‘the World’ settles down to absorbing what it really knew already, at least, those that watched ’24 hours’ with Jack Bauer, ie, that the NSA and other US spy agencies, snooped on everyone, Greenwald will be forgotten and may even be in a US prison. There are accusations that he conspired with Snowden to steal the top secret documents and this conspiracy may even be extended to The Guardian’s Rustbriger who may also be complicit.

    • Good question. But, as far as I can tell, they’ve never previously cited an anti-Semite. Plus, as Greenwald doesn’t even identify as Jewish (or cite his Jewish background as influencing him in any way), I don’t see how he impacts “the Jewish story”.

  4. Greenwald famously commented in his own column at Salon that the greatest regret of his life was that he was born too late to be old enough to help the American Nazi Party attempt to famously stage a march through Skokie Ill back in the 1970’s (Skokie being at the time, the town with the largest population of Shoah survivors in the US at the time).

    As a consolation prize he had to comfort himself with ‘only’ being able to legally defend neo Nazi Matt Hale in his quest to be admitted to the Illinois Bar. Hale was later sent to prison for life for his role in mass murdering the family of Federal Judge because they were Jewish.