Brits for the Islamic State: Guardian publishes two pro-ISIS letters

Based on a recent poll, 7 percent of residents in the UK support the barbaric jihadists of the Islamic State (ISIS), which, though incredibly disturbing in its own right, represents a far lower level of support than in France, where 16 percent expressed their approval.

While support in Europe for ISIS presumably comes mostly from Islamists in predominantly Muslim immigrant communities, the following letters, published at the Guardian on Aug. 27 (which were in response to an op-ed titled ‘Isis: an apocalyptic cult carving a place in the modern world‘) were penned by Brits in largely white, non-immigrant communities. 

The Islamic State caliphate finally realises a dream that goes back to the 1920s when the Muslim Brotherhood was established. Syria has been its main target since the 1960s. Assassinations of government figures hardened the Assad regime’s security apparatus and freedom was sacrificed for security. Syria remains resolutely secular and the nation’s disparate minorities continue to support Assad. The Islamists could not overthrow them, even with US weaponry and Saudi finance. Now they have established a base where they can fulfil their dream of an Islamist state. Why not let them have it? Agree new borders with Syria and Iraq to replace the Sykes-Picot lines in the sand, encourage repopulation of the region with fundamentalists and fund relocation of the refugees. The state of Israel was established against a similar background of desperation mixed with terrorist cruelty – existential challenges bring out the worst in people. The west supported the Zionist dream, so why not the Islamist one?
Craig Sams
Hastings, East Sussex

John Gray (An apocalyptic cult carving a place in the modern world, 26 August) says that “to view Isis as expressing the core of one of the world’s great religious is to endorse Isis’s view of itself, which Islamic religious authorities across the world have rejected”.

I thought the point of the Enlightenment (and the Guardian) was to take nothing on authority but to think for oneself and test one’s theories rationally. Mr Gray, author of Al Qaeda and What it Means to be Modern, appears to have missed this point. Neither the views of Isis about itself nor the views of “religious authorities” are or should be determinative. I prefer to think for myself and, having read the Qur’an from cover to cover several times, I agree with Isis.
Paul Simmons
East Twickenham, Middlesex

We’ve read some outlandish letters at the Guardian before, but these are simply beyond comprehension.

We’ll leave the simply delusional comparison with Zionism, in the first letter, aside, and just note that ISIS represents a simply monstrous brand of Islamic extremism, whose members have kidnapped large numbers of women for sex slavery and engaged in the mass murder of religious minorities.  Their objective is the establishment of a worldwide Caliphate.


ISIS Tweeted this photo showing a child holding a severed head of an executed man, with a phrase boasting that: “This is how the cubs of the Caliphate are raised up”.

The SITE Intelligence Group provides good background:

The massacres carried out by IS are an integral expression of the organization’s worldview and not random atrocities.  This ideology, while related to the jihadi-salafism practiced by al-Qaeda (AQ), is far more extreme, leading the Islamic State to claim that it is AQ that has altered the original creed and methodology of Usama bin Ladin.  Among the specific aspects that set it apart from al-Qaeda’s belief system are a requirement of absolute obedience to their so-called “caliph” with no dissention and no organizations that are separate from his control; a demand for constant warfare against anyone who supports the “apostate” regimes; and a focus on wiping out entire cultures and people groups, including Yazidis, Christians, Sabaeans, and all Shi’a.

Each piece of this abhorrent ideology comes with deliberate planning and purpose-built organizations designed to realize the new “caliph’s” vision.  For instance, in order to impose their horrific vision of society on the people of Syria, the Caliphate is forcibly inculcating ordinary Muslims, especially the young, into the Islamic State’s version of Islam.  Recent reporting from Raqqa, Syria, by Vice News, an edgy group of journalists known for their work in dangerous spots around the world, shows the use of indoctrination centers (some in former churches), mobile proselytization vans, and outdoor propaganda gatherings to introduce unwilling citizens of Raqqa to the Islamic State’s ideology and way of life.  There is also video footage of strangely compliant prisoners, all calmly agreeing that they have sinned and deserve their punishment of death or beatings.

To coerce conquered populations into living out IS’s vision, the groups has set up “shari’a police,” or the Hisba.  Based on a medieval institution sometimes known as the “Body to Command Right and Forbid Wrong,” the Hisba enforces compliance with the group’s extremist version of Islamic law.  AQ affiliates like Shabaab have set up similar units that have the authority to arrest anyone caught committing infractions against that group’s stringent legal code

IS has also created an ideologically motivated force, similar to the Nazi SS troops, to act as their shock forces in this fight.  The units, known as the “Inghimasiyun,” or “those who plunge [into battle],” recall a concept of warfare from the early days of Islam, when the most ardent of the believers would rush into the enemies’ ranks without taking care for their own lives.  In a similar fashion, accounts from Iraq and Syria suggest that the Inghimasiyun often carry out suicide bombings either as part of the planned assault or as a way to avoid capture. 

Even more disturbing than the Inghimasiyun are the so-called “Dhabiha” (or “Slaughterers”), which constitute what would be the Einsatzgruppen (Nazi death squads) of IS.  The purpose of these units, as with the Nazi “task forces,” is to carry out the massacre of enemies of the state in an organized fashion.  Unlike the Nazi units, however, the Dhabiha take care to film themselves carrying out their atrocities and post photos and videos to social media in order to terrify others into obedience.  The recent beheading of 700 tribal members involved in an attempted uprising in Dayr al-Zawr, Syria against IS fits the modus operandi of the Dhabiha, as does the posting online soon afterward of videos of the carnage.

SITE reasonably characterizes ISIS’s medieval ideology as akin to the worst totalitarian states of the last century.

ISIS is simply evil, and the thought that even 7 percent of Brits – including, evidently, some inspired by a far-left ideology – view the group favorably is truly frightening. 

25 replies »

  1. The Guardian likes to ensure every now and then that their important demographic of the mentally deranged always feel welcome and accommodated.

  2. BTW that poll is insane. It says among young French the support for ISIS is 27%! How is that possible? I don’t think 27% of the population are even Muslim…?

  3. What else can be expected from an egregious rag which, during Cast Lead, published a fulsome obituary to Nizar Rayyan, suicide murder recruiter who sent one of his own sons on a successful mission, who, when warned that he was a target and that he should leave his apartment and go to shelter, refused to leave and would not allow his wives and children to leave either. They all died, of course.

    When a rag eulogises such a piece of dreck, it requires no leap to accept that it will support the same dreck from people who write letters to it.

  4. I think we have come full circle since the seventies Left admired the USSR and European terrorists were given training, safe refuge & weapon’s in Soviet Arab client states. Ditto Edward Snowden. And these dudes are just getting started. The Islamofascist’s and their white Neo-Socialist mate’s. This generation has no relationship with WW2. They for the most part did not meet anybody who fought of fled. They did not see European cities with their scars.
    This whole debate is full of innuendo see Blumenthal & Breitbart at 1:35

    The Left has absorbed the Islamist m.o. in speaking in a hidden form and never assuming a clear position. Like the Hamas terrorists in Aza, they blend in with the general discourse, usurping a humanist discourse. They are one of the people, were Zionists and others are ‘racists’ etc.
    Much of this has been relegated to academia, agitprop and a new form of Journalism/hacktivism. The general tax payer & private universities for the most part seem to subsidise these people. See Steven Salaita.

  5. ‘The state of Israel was established against a similar background of desperation mixed with terrorist cruelty ……’ Craig Sams

    Ah yes, well do we remember hundreds of women and children buried alive in the sand by Zionists, the suicide bombers yelling ‘Greater Israel’ as they detonated themselves in crowded Arab souks, the filming of beheadings of those who’d committed the ‘crime’ of simply not being a Zionist. Yep, lots of similarities between the Zionists and ISIS!

    Does the mental hospital where Craig escaped from know he’s wandering the streets with access to a computer linked to the Internet?

  6. Hamas executions happen all the time, without notice by the western media, `cause Hamas is ‘moderate’.

  7. I don’t believe the second letter cited can be called supportive of ISIS. The letter writer says that he agrees with ISIS that ISIS “express[es] the core” of Islam. He does not state that he is in agreement with ISIS on any other matter. Paul Simmons disapproves of John Gray’s reliance on Muslim “religious authorities” rather than on critical thinking to determine what is essential to belief in Islam. Unfortunately, parroting others statements uncritically is (IMO) “the core” of journalism. I would put money on Mr. Simmons being personally opposed to Islamist values.

  8. You clearly are misunderstanding the second letter. The author is saying ISIS accurately reflects the core values of Islam in his estimation, not that he agrees with their worldview. His positive reference to the Enlightenment should make that obvious.

  9. Actually, I don’t think that second letter is written in support of Isis.

    Firstly he’s parodying The Guardian and the leftist notion that there is no such thing as objective truth. Then he implies that the Koran sanctions bloody murder.

    Hardly full-throated support for Isis, is it?