Telegraph

Telegraph report questioning antisemitic incident in Paris continues to unravel


We posted recently about a shameful article in The Telegraph which attempted to undermine multiple undisputed accounts of an antisemitic attack in France last summer.  

snapshot

We noted that media outlets across the board agreed that, on July 13, 2014, a violent mob of over 100 pro-Palestinian rioters tried to storm the Don Isaac Abravanel Synagogue in eastern Paris, trapping hundreds of Jews inside. 

There are videos and photos of the attack – representing but one incident within the larger tsunami of antisemitism that has plagued French Jews in recent years.

Telegraph writers Peter Allen and James Rothwell specifically took aim at a story published in last month’s edition of Vanity Fair (The troubling question in the French Jewish community: Is it time to leave?, Marie Brenner, August 2015) which provided readers with the harrowing details of the attack. 

In our post, we refuted most of the allegations in the Telegraph’s “expose” of the Vanity Fair (VF) article.

However, one charge in particular still needed to be answered: the suggestion that worshippers at the Paris synagogue, including Paris’s chief rabbi, Michel Gugenheim, were not in fact trapped inside the building, threatened by an angry Palestinian mob and rescued by police.  Indeed, The Telegraph claimed that the account was denied by a spokesperson for the synagogue. 

Recently, however, VF’s Marie Brenner published a follow-up story in response to the Telegraph article. The new VF piece includes an exclusive interview with the chief rabbi.

Here’s the relevant section from the VF follow-up:

When I told the chief rabbi that word was starting to get out that he might not, in fact, have been rescued from the crisis at the synagogue, or that the situation might not have been alarming, he responded, “I am glad to tell you that I was in the synagogue. I was rescued by the police. That is all true. There were a lot of people who were all afraid. That is all true. That is it.”

Worshippers had gathered that Sunday at the synagogue to pray for peace. The rabbi, who never spoke with the Telegraph, told me what happened: “We came into the synagogue and the ceremony started. Suddenly, they said that the guys from the demonstration are coming against the synagogue. My policemen said to me, ‘You can’t go out.’ They called the police commissioner in charge of security and said they had to send a force to protect the synagogue. For an hour, we were locked in. After one hour, my policemen told me, ‘Rabbi, we are coming out.’ Only me. I was rescued.” The others were kept inside for the next two hours. “I saw the street filled with police and they took me very fast,” the rabbi said. “They said, ‘Fast, fast, fast.’ My security kept saying, ‘Dépêchez vous!’”—“hurry up”—“to get away from this place.”

It has also been alleged that the synagogue’s president, Serge Benhaim, denied the events of July 13, 2014, as I, and many others, reported them. But when I spoke to Benhaim about this last week, he confirmed my account. “There was a large crowd coming close to the synagogue,” he said. “I heard them yelling ‘Death to the Jews.’ We kept everyone locked inside until the police could come. It could have been a very dangerous situation, but no one, luckily, entered the synagogue.” He added that no one from the  Telegraph ever contacted him.

The Telegraph’s efforts to cast doubt about the terrifying antisemitic incident have, at this point, almost completely unraveled.  Messrs. Allen and Rothwell should be ashamed of themselves.

Though Telegraph editors – following our communication with their office – have updated the story to include a link to the new VF response, a substantive correction to the original false claims is clearly required.

We encourage you to contact Telegraph editors here to complain. 

Though he blocked us, we also encourage you to tweet the lead journalist in the story, Peter Allen.

@peterallenparis

8 replies »

  1. Western Media will not change. In fact, one of the rules of Western Media is that they need their paradigms to eat. So if Jews = Money and Israel = Control of World, don’t expect a Western Journo like Peter “I’m A Fucking Asswipe” Allen to, you know, give a damn.

  2. The British media seems especially prone to downplaying acts of anti-Semitism connected to the Arab war against the Jews whenever and wherever possible. They are also quite resolute in their resistance to exposure, but we shall expose them.

  3. CORRECTION Note please that the photograph you here use from the synagogue is brave fighters from la ligue de défense juive (Jewish defencer league) and not dirty animals – I am in the picture! We meet at our loved synagogue and go to proud victory against Arabs cons. Please change photograph as it is wrong to portray brave Jewish men as terrorists. Vive Israël ! Fuck the enemies!

    • — rec’d a very unsatisfactory response — ‘nothing in the article contravenes standards etc’. I replied, pointing out that even the headline was wrong (no-one suggested this was a ‘Nazi’ mob. No response as yet.

  4. Though the Telegraph editorial staff should be strongly criticised on this occasion for using the demonstrably dishonest articles of Peter Allan – who previously seriously misled readers of the Daily Mail and Standard on this and related topics – it must be said in fairness that its coverage at the time was satisfactory. For really authoritative articles people who consult UK Media Watch and understand French should also read Shmuel Trigano and Michel Gurfinkiel, as well as this study by the very conscientious Veronique Chemla – in my view the most comprehensive and detailed article to date – http://www.veroniquechemla.info/2014/07/c.html.

    (There is also a shortish piece http://jforum.fr/2015/06/france-limpunite-des-antisemites-violents-reste-la-norme/)

  5. Makes you wonder what Peter Allen’s real motive is, doesn’t it? Is he an anti-semite, or in the pay of some Islamic outfit? He certainly seems to have an axe to grind and is not averse to telling lies, and there has to be a reason for that.