UKMW prompts Times of London correction – admits US does NOT call settlements ‘illegal’

On Saturday night, we tweeted this to journalist Gregg Carlstrom in response to his Dec. 17th Times of London article claiming that the US position is that the Israeli settlements are “illegal”.

The article embedded in the tweet is an Associated Press (AP) correction – prompted by CAMERA – on the same exact issue.


The fact is that the US position on settlements (and the wording used to condemn such activity) has been consistent for roughly thirty-five years. In the early 80s, the Reagan administration reversed Jimmy Carter’s position that the Israeli settlements were illegal, saying: “As to the West Bank, I believe the settlements there — I disagreed when the previous Administration referred to them as illegal, they’re not illegal” (New York Times, Feb. 3, 1981).  

Subsequent U.S. administrations – through Obama – have maintained the same position.  Though they’ve obviously disapproved of Israeli construction across the green line, they did not label them as “illegal”. 

A perfect example of this continuity in US policy since Reagan was seen in 2011, when then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called Israeli settlements “illegitimate” before the US vetoed a UN Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlements as “illegal”.   As CNN reported at the time, “The Obama administration has been critical of Israeli settlement construction but has not gone as far as to call it “illegal.”

Secretary of State John Kerry used the exact same language as Clinton.

On Sunday morning, we contacted Times of London editors concerning Carlstrom’s claim, noting both the specific AP correction and the broader context outlined above.  This morning, they informed us that the article had been amended.

The following correction appeared online and in the print edition of the paper on Dec. 20th.



(Also, see here for a recent ABC News correction on the same issue prompted by CAMERA.)

4 replies »

  1. I have submitted a complaint to IPSO regarding Gregg Carlstrom’s erroneous claim (twice in two days) that ‘all settlements are illegal’ in international law’.

    Carlstrom’s reports are an embarrassment to The Times.

  2. Of course, even the US position that Jewish Israeli homes in Judea and Samaria are “illegitimate” is a lie that is told to appease Arabs. It is only less cowardly than the European position by degrees.