A Guardian op-ed by David Zonsheine, board chairman of B’Tselem, charged Israel with engaging in a “barbaric” act against Bedouin in Khan al-Ahmar, an encampment in the contested E-1 area between Jerusalem and Ma’ale Adumim – within (Israeli controlled) Area C of the West Bank.
The article begins thusly:
Israel is intent on destroying the homes of the 173 Palestinians who live in the small shepherding community of Khan al-Ahmar, along with the school that serves 150 children from the area. Last month, Israel’s high court of justice removed the last obstacle to this barbaric act of demolishing an entire community in order to forcibly transfer its residents and take over their land.
We’ve highlighted the words “their land” because it erroneously suggests that the Palestinians own the land in question. However, as is made clear elsewhere in the article – and, as CAMERA demonstrated in a recent post on the dispute – nobody, not even the NGOs advocating on their behalf, claim that it is legally “their” land. So, in what sense can the eviction of people living in illegal and unauthorized communities – be they in the Bedouin encampment of Khan al-Ahmar (built and sustained with the help of foreign NGOs) or the recently evacuated Israeli community of Netiv Ha’avot – be considered “barbaric”?
Zonsheine further argues that the Bedouin families are living in illegal encampments because they have no other choice:
These residents are not breaking the law deliberately. Israeli policy has prevented them from even applying for building permits. This has left them no choice but to build without permits and, as no community remains stagnant, they have had to continue developing and building that way.
However, the Bedouin of Khan al-Ahma, and the NGOs representing them, have refused offers by Israeli authorities to relocate them to land, in the Jahalin HaVatikah neighborhood of nearby Abu Dis, suitable for their nomadic lifestyle.
The government…set aside state land for a new neighborhood on the outskirts of Abu Dis, named “Jahalin West,” and offered a package worth over half a million shekels for each wife in each of the Jahalin households—a package that includes a large plot of land, completely developed and zoned for residential construction, with infrastructure for water and electricity. The new neighborhood will offer services…including health clinics, public transportation, proper schools, access to employment and more.
Zonshein then characterises the government decision, backed by the supreme court, to evict the Bedouin as an “act that could constitute a war crime” without even attempting to back up his allegation.
In one final act of deception, the Guardian contributor writes:
Moreover, the demolition of Khan al-Ahmar will have significant repercussions for possible solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: clearing the area from Palestinians will effectively bisect the West Bank from north to south.
The claim that clearing Palestinians from the E-1 area, and building Israeli communities in that area, between Ma’ale Adumim and Jerusalem, will bisect (cut in half) north West Bank from south West Bank, making a contiguous state impossible, is a frequent and false claim. As CAMERA has demonstrated, even if Israel were to annex all of E1, “approximately 15 kilometers remain east of E1, enabling north-south passage and ensuring contiguity for a future Palestinian state”.
In short, Zonshein’s op-ed on the planned eviction of illegal Bedouin encampments employ all the tools within the Guardian’s delegitimisation playbook: lies, half truths, the use of hyperbolic language and completely unsubstantiated accusations of criminality to characterize Israeli policy.
- THE LA TIMES, THE BEDOUIN OF KHAN AL AHMAR AND ‘THEIR LAND’ (CAMERA)
- Does the Guardian own a map? Op-ed falsely claims E-1 would cut West Bank in two (UK Media Watch)
- BBC News disregards al Quds Day hate in London once again (BBC Watch)