Guardian narrative on cause of Palestinian poverty is pure fantasy

In an official editorial (“The Guardian view on Trump and Israel-Palestine: the reality behind Kushner’s fantasy”) published on June 25, the Guardian predictably lambasted the new US peace plan, particularly its economy-first approach of promoting Palestinian prosperity as a path to a permanent resolution.

Whilst there was little in the editorial that was surprising, one sentence in particular caught our eye, because it says so much about how little the Guardian understands the root causes of Palestinian economic woes.

Many of these initiatives have been proposed before – in some cases, more than a decade ago – and are unachievable under current conditions. The report advocates them nonetheless because it simply refuses to recognise that the biggest obstacle to economic development is the West Bank’s occupation and the blockade of Gaza.

On the same day, the Guardian published another analysis by Mid-East correspondent Martin Chulov which similarly opined that “a central factor in the slow growth of the Palestinian economy has been the Israeli occupation”.

First, the suggestion that Israel’s blockade of Gaza is the biggest obstacle to the territory’s economic development grossly misunderstands the basic causality.  The blockade is not a cause, but the natural result of Hamas’s decision to prioritise terror, and their goal of annihilating Israel, over the well-being of their citizens.  No country in the world would allow the unimpeded flow of weapons to a territory on its border ruled by a government that has launched thousands of rockets at its civilians.  If there wasn’t a fanatical, Islamist terror group controlling Gaza, there would be no blockade. 

Turning to the West Bank, again, the Guardian gets it wrong.  First, they conveniently ignore the fact that Palestinians could have permanently ended the occupation if they hadn’t rejected Israeli peace offers in 2000 and 2008 – offers that would have created a Palestinian state in Gaza, more than 90% of the West Bank and a capital in east Jerusalem.  As Israel is of course not going to unilaterally withdrawal from the disputed territory in the absence of a peace deal, to blame Israel – and only Israel – for the continuing occupation is dishonest. 

Moreover, the Guardian editorial’s assignment of blame for the West Bank’s economic problems solely on Israel is deceptive in another way: it ignores the injurious economic impact of PA corruption, poor governance, bad budgetary decisions (such as ‘pay for slay‘) and an extremely illiberal political culture that’s inimical to prosperity.  Plus, unlike Gaza, there are no major Israeli restrictions on the PA export of traditional products (agriculture, building materials, etc.) to foreign markets. 

Moreover, in addition to the export of traditional products, if Palestinians worked on developing their own high-tech industries in Ramallah and Gaza City, there would be nothing preventing them from reaping economic benefits from such virtual products-based economies. 

Palestinians at the first coding bootcamp in Gaza

In Israel, for instance, high-tech exports represented over 45% of the $102 billion in total exports in 2017. 

Though there is no denying that the ongoing conflict has a negative impact on the West Bank and Gaza economies, Israel represents proof that a country with built-in structural impediments (a lack of natural resources, a hostile political climate, etc.) can find innovative ways to achieve long-term growth. 

Finally, whatever your view of the new US plan, it certainly seems possible for Palestinians to hold two ideas in their heads at the same time:

  1. We will NEVER give up our goal of an independent Palestinian state.
  2. We will NOT turn down billions in aid to build our infrastructure, economy and educational system so that our future Palestinian state will be economically self-sufficient. 

Though economic problems facing Gaza and the West Bank are different, the editorial’s reflexive dismissal of the US plan and myopic diagnosis of the territories’ challenges have one common – and characteristically Guardian – thread: the failure to hold Palestinians even minimally responsible for their fate.

Related Articles

6 replies »

  1. Palestinian propaganda at work yet again. In the 1970’s Palestinians enjoyed robust economic growth and then they brought us the Intifada and themselves economic stagnation.

    During the 1970’s, the West Bank and Gaza constituted the fourth fastest-growing economy in the world — ahead of such “wonders” as Singapore, Hong Kong, and Korea, and substantially ahead of Israel itself. Although GNP per capita grew somewhat more slowly, the rate was still high by international standards, with per-capita GNP expanding tenfold between 1968 and 1991 from $165 to $1,715 (compared with Jordan’s $1,050, Egypt’s $600, Turkey’s $1,630, and Tunisia’s $1,440). By 1999, Palestinian per-capita income was nearly double Syria’s, more than four times Yemen’s, and 10 percent higher than Jordan’s (one of the better off Arab states). Only the oil-rich Gulf states and Lebanon were more affluent.

  2. on the other side, Trump and Co. think money solves all problems. They have no conception of religious tribalism, even though much of Trump’s support base are composed of tribalistic American Christians.

    billions have poured into the Palestinian territories for decades…where has the money gone other than private Arab Sheik bank accounts? The fact remains the same today as it did 100 years-ago…the Arabs don’t want Israel there.

    As a test, Kushner would do better offering every Palestinian $10,000, money that would go directly to them. Then see who would smoke the peace pipe. But, Hamas would warn their people to reject the offer or else.

  3. Or perhaps the idea is to hilite Palestinian intransigence. It may be that this plan was a trap designed to fail. Palestinians have never wasted an opportunity to waste an opportunity.

    • Have a care, sir! “Trump’s support base” is not “composed of tribalistic American Christians. We Christians are not a tribe! Is this slander or just ignorance on the grandest level? It does not help the cause of defense of Israel– which is the beginning and the end of the purpose of Christian Zionist organizations. Is it hard to believe that this denigration could be founded on ignorance. It must, therefore, be founded in plain old malice. The editors of this website ought to have caught this malicious nonsense.

      Professor Paul Merkley, Ottawa, Canada

  4. Without Eurotrash money and Israeli aid the Islamofascist colonists would have no economy at all. Terrorism is not an viable economy