What’s so funny about Saeb Erekat’s call for “peace”, “rights” and “international law”?

In a Jan 19th op-ed at the Guardian, Saeb Erekat calls on the EU to recognise a Palestinian state.  Perhaps the only elements noteworthy in Erekat’s otherwise predictable, reductive and mono-causal explanation for Palestine’s woes are his word choices: he used the word “peace” eight times, Palestinian “rights” seven times and Israel’s putative violations of “international law” five times.

So, what exactly does Erekat mean by peace, rights and international law?

Well, based on his recent comments on another matter, they don’t appear to mean much at all.

Media Line reported on Jan. 6th about new terms added by the European Union in 2019 which merely “obligate Palestinian institutions to ensure that no beneficiaries of their projects or programs are affiliated with groups listed on the European Union’s terrorist organisations list”.

However, it wasn’t merely representatives of Palestinian NGOs who rejected the requirement.

Saeb Erekat also weighed in.

On December 3, Saeb Erekat, the secretary of the Palestinian Liberation Organization’s Executive Committee, in a letter addressed to the European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell, called on the EU to reconsider the new conditions and to ensure equal, impartial and transparent access to funding for all.

According to a publication sent to The Media line by Erekat’s office, Erekat denounced such restrictions, which, it was claimed, directly affect Palestinian rights pursuant to international law, in particular the right to self-determination, stressing that it is not in line with the European Union’s commitment to a two-state solution and peace and stability in the region.

Let’s briefly unpack this. Erekat is defending the “right” of Palestinian NGOs supported by the EU to use their funds to benefit groups listed by the EU as terrorist entities, and that to preclude the “right” of groups which call for Israel’s destruction and the murder of Israeli civilians to receive this money is inconsistent with “peace”, “self-determination” and “international law”.

So, Guardian readers should – but, of course, won’t – take note: For Saeb Erekat, words and lofty, progressive rhetoric don’t have objective meanings.  They mean, as Humpty Dumpty said, just what he chooses them to mean, neither more nor less.

Related Posts:

7 replies »

  1. When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.” “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”

    • > When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”

      So Humpty Dumpty was a Socialist.

  2. Poor Saeb. He was given a state that would have guaranteed all the Palestinians their rights. Except he had to also accept Israel’s right to exist, and peace loving Saeb just couldn’t allow that.

    So first off goes the bomb at the Sbarro during lunch hour…. (Understand, the little kids killed were going to be IDF one day)

    Then off goes the bomb at the Dolphinarium dance club on a Friday night…. (See, those were dancing Israelis)

    Finally the bomb goes off at the Netanya Hotel during that year’s seder….. (Saeb totally respects the Jewish religion)


    Weird. All of those actions, committed by Palestinians, killed any chance of obtaining their own state. And it’s all Israel’s fault.


  3. Islamofascist terrorists just love inventing ‘international laws’. If they even exist, they state the exact of whatever they claim. For the most part just like ‘Palestinians’ they are invented out of their asses

  4. When Palestinian non-negotiator Erekat says “in particular the right to self-determination” he, of course, would exclude one particular group from “the right to self-determination”.

  5. And yet Erekat tells the EU that Israel is the problem.

    The Shin Bet security service foiled over 560 terror attacks in 2019, including 10 suicide bombings and four kidnappings, agency chief Nadav Argaman said Monday.

    “The past year was filled with security challenges on all the fronts in which we operate. During it, we prevented upwards of 560 significant terror attacks, including 10 suicide bombings, four kidnappings and more than 300 shooting attacks,” Argaman said.

    The number was a slight uptick from 2018, when the Shin Bet was credited with foiling some 500 terror attacks.