8 replies »

  1. Mossad is an amoral death machine just like many such organisations . To suggest they would kill Obama is no worse than annoying.The suggestion is that this is evidence of ” Jewish conspiracy ” and it misses by a mile. You are confusing historical anti Semitic madness with present day criticism of Israel whose secret service could quite easily consider perpetrating such an act…

    The constituent post is awful.. absolutely awful.

  2. Try including in your comment ‘terrorist scum’ and see how long it takes for the ‘impartial and unbigoted’ moderators to react.

  3. Mossad is an amoral death machine just like many such organisations.

    I understand the logic behind this assertion. Mossad is “death machining” Berchmans’ gentle moral Hamas heroes who are naturally for protecting human life, human rights for Christians, Jews, Buddhists, kufars, atheists etc. Killing his fascists pals hurts him very much.

  4. So, someone alleges the one Jewish state in the world will bump off the US president (effectively, of the world, for all the US’ decline), in a false flag operation, that inevitably brings to mind certain conspiracy theories about 9/11, and Berchmans says that is a perfectly reasonable, defensible proposition, in no way racist or Anti-Semitic, and in no need of moderation.

    Well, that shows how far Anti-Semitism is normative among the CIF chattering class, if not its moderators, instructed, doubtless, in Berchman’s policies i.e. those of the ignorant and the bigoted.

  5. Dante

    ” So, someone alleges the one Jewish state in the world will bump off the US president , and Berchmans says that is .. in no way racist or Anti-Semitic,”

    If you see any criticism of Israel as criticism of “the Jewish state” then of course it will be anti Semitic…by definition. This is a circular thing you argue you must know this …you cant be as dull as this post suggests.

    ” and in no need of moderation”

    It should have been deleted Im sorry I didnt make that clearer. It is incendiary and provocative.

  6. ‘If you see any criticism of Israel as criticism of “the Jewish state” then of course it will be anti Semitic…by definition. This is a circular thing you argue you must know this …you cant be as dull as this post suggests.’

    You were defending the allegation that the security service of the Jewish state was plotting a false flag assassination of the leader of the free world i.e. necessarily with the connivance of the state of Israel. An extraordinary allegation, one I have never heard before with regard to any other state, with the possible exception of the USSR or Nazi Germany i.e. major states with which the US was at war, hot or cold.

    I brought up the ‘Jewish’ character of the state of Israel because I do not think it merely coincidental with the uniqueness of the allegation, or with your thinking it both reasonable and defensible.

    This is a common argument you have used: if one calls Israel a Jewish state, so you say, one renders any criticism of it Anti-Semitic. Only, however, for Anti-Semites. When most people call Israel a or the Jewish state, they mean it is the one state in the world where Jews are a majority, and which was established by Jews to be their restored national state existence, as a matter of justice and need, by and for an historically dispossessed and stateless people, because of a unique connection with the land, and a right of return very similar to that of Palestinians today.

    It doesn’t mean ‘Jewish’ as in ‘all or even most Jews in the world’. That is what you mean, and what the Anti-Semite means.

    You might as well argue that criticising Scotland qua Scotland, the land of the Scots, means criticising all Scots around the world, and is thus intrinsically racist against Scots in general.

    ” and in no need of moderation” ‘It should have been deleted Im sorry I didnt make that clearer. It is incendiary and provocative.’

    OK.