Independent

Indy TV critic decries attack on free expression by ‘powerful pro-Israel lobby’


In monitoring the UK media’s coverage of Israel and the Jewish world, we’ve previously noted the curious dynamic in which even culture critics (journalists who don’t cover politics or world affairs) manage to adopt the hard left party line on Israel and the perceived power of the ‘Israeli lobby’. 

A case in point is a review at the Independent, by TV critic Gerard Gilbert, of the upcoming BBC2 mini-series The Honourable Woman starring Maggie Gyllenhaal.  The series centers on “Nessa Stein, the daughter of a murdered Zionist arms dealer who now runs a charitable London organisation seeking a solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict.”

Half-way through the largely positive review, Gilbert adds the following, seemingly out of nowhere:

The Honourable Woman’s fair-minded take on the savagely divisive Palestinian question would presumably make it nigh-on impossible to get made in America with its powerful pro-Israel lobbies.

Of course, Gilbert doesn’t bother to cite an example of any previous “fair-minded” take on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that was nixed due to the “powerful pro-Israel lobbies” and, indeed, the critical success of the pro-Palestinian film 5 Broken Cameras suggests that such advocacy art isn’t adversely affected by such ‘pressure groups’.

Quite interestingly, this broadside against the Israel lobby isn’t a one-off for the culture critic.

In 2011, Gilbert similarly expressed his frustration with the power of the lobby in an article at the Indy.

Here’s Gilbert’s take on a BBC programme about the controversy that surrounded Monty Python’s Life of Brian in 1979, and what he argued was the steady erosion, since that time, of the artistic freedom to engage in such criticism of religion:

Freedom of speech can be a much tougher call in the polarised 21st-century than it was in the fag-end of liberal Seventies Britain, and if BBC4 wanted to take a moment from our recent past to shed light on the present, then there are plenty of controversies of younger vintage available to them.

How about the fatwa issued by Ayatollah Khomeini against Salman Rushdie in 1989 over his novel The Satanic Verses, a death sentence that remains in place today, and that led to Rushdie spending almost a decade in hiding, as well as the violent attacks against various translators and publishers (including an arson attack at a cultural festival in Turkey that left 37 people dead)? Perhaps Sanjeev Bhaskar could play Rushdie.

Or how about a drama about the Danish cartoons depicting Muhammad, and the subsequent worldwide protests, or the play Behtzi, which sparked riots by Birmingham Sikhs in 2004. Or how about, for that matter, the remorseless attacks on journalists and academics in any way critical of Israel

In response to Gilbert’s complaint about such “remorseless attacks” on the media and academia by powerful forces, The CST’s Mark Gardner observed the following:

I am unaware that the Chief Rabbi (of Britain, Israel, or anywhere else for that matter) has issued a death sentence against the Guardian, the Independent, the University and College Union, or any other “journalists and academics in any way critical of Israel”.

I am unaware of pro-Israel lobby groups having incited deadly riots against BBC offices around the world. I am unaware of British anti-Israel academics being burnt and bombed when they venture abroad.

I am unaware of rioting by Jews in Golders Green, or Tottenham, or Salford, or Gateshead, in response to British media and academic criticism of Israel.

The Indy’s Gilbert, like other UK commentators, absurdly conflates mere criticism – and other forms of legitimate political activism – by Jews and pro-Israel groups (over what’s deemed to be anti-Israel bias or even antisemitism in the public sphere) with the kind of threats or intimidation (or even violence) exhibited by some groups which truly threatens freedom of expression in the West.

10 replies »

  1. Israel is a canvass for European ‘liberals’ to project their dark fantasies and prejudices onto. This kind of BBC drama – parochial, middle class and one-dimensional, is just another self-righteous fashion statement that reinforces the bigotry of the ignorant purveyors of British culture like Gilbert.

  2. I hate to break it to all the boring, conspiracy driven, hate mongers and Israel-bashers– you know, the run-of-the-mill anti-Semites whose heads will more than likely explode before generating some kind of original thought– but the Jews don’t really run America. If we did, we might have had a President. Surely, the House Speaker wouldn’t have lost his primary. And, needless to say, Israel would be seen in a most positive light. As it is, even PBS goes out of their way to blame rocket attacks on Gaza in response to 50 missiles at Sderot as really being a “revenge attack” on Palestinians en masse. Hobby Lobby has more control over the daily American life than the Jewish Lobby, but see, one is a real corporation and the other is a facet of imagination, so naturally the BBC TV critic sees one everywhere and doesn’t believe in the other.

    This is how they do it. This is how the real Devil shows up….. In the details. See, Hobby Lobby, they want to control their employees health care. The Jewish Lobby was incapable of keeping Eric Cantor as the House Rep from Northern Virginia. The BBC and Gerard Gilbert? Cheapass hate mongers with bad teeth. Staying classy is difficult when below the surface you’re really just an ugly piece of shit.

  3. Gilbert: Or how about, for that matter, the remorseless attacks on journalists and academics in any way critical of Israel?

    At first this kind of crap was annoying. Now it’s simply boring. You’d expect to – and do – find hyperbole like this from BTL posters. But from a TV critic?

  4. “The Honourable Woman’s fair-minded take on the savagely divisive Palestinian question would presumably make it nigh-on impossible to get made in America with its powerful pro-Israel lobbies.”

    Never mind “fair-minded,” just fair would do nicely. Where in Europe could one get a fair take on Israel, or the Jews of North America? (You know, places where cycles of deep rooted anti-Semitic hysteria haven’t been happening for century after century.) O.K. Maybe the Czechs (another people betrayed for “peace in our time”). Let’s face it, no British filmmaker is going to produce “The Nonie Darwish Story.”

  5. Culture critics are not known for their political intelligence, on the contrary.