On Aug. 11th, the Guardian published an Associated Press article on clashes that day at the Temple Mount instigated by rioting Muslim worshipers objecting to a small number of Jews who were initially allowed to visit their faith’s holiest site. (Sunday marked both the start of the Islamic holiday of Eid al-Adha and the Jewish fast day of Tisha B’Av.)
According to reports, dozens of Muslim worshipers were injured during the clashes, as well as four Israeli police officers.
There’s no question that the Muslim worshipers were responsible for the violence, as the original AP report explained:
Large numbers of Palestinians had gathered at the gates of the compound early Sunday after rumors circulated that police would allow Jewish visitors to enter the site. The protesters chanted “Allahu Akbar” (God is greatest) and threw stones at police, who then charged into the compound while firing stun grenades and rubber-coated bullets.
However, the Guardian version of the AP report just so happened to omit that key paragraph on the riot’s cause, leaving readers with no information on why exactly Israeli police “clashed” with Muslim worshipers.
In fact, other than the Guardian, every news outlet we surveyed that published a version of the same AP report included that original paragraph noting the Palestinian violence which caused the clashes on Sunday – providing another example of how the Guardian routinely omits important facts in order to obfuscate Palestinian culpability.
- Has there been even one incident of Jews attacking Muslims at the Temple Mount? (UK Media Watch)
- Washington Post omits context and facts on ‘occupation’ (CAMERA)
- BBC interest in Israeli politicians’ legal cases has its limits (BBC Watch)