Corrections

Indy corrects a Robert Fisk smear of UN Watch – but errors remain


An op-ed at the Independent by Robert Fisk about UN Special Rapporteur Michael Lynk (“Michael Lynk’s UN report on Israeli settlements speaks the truth – but the world refuses to listen”, Nov. 15) included the following claim

When Lynk was appointed special rapporteur, Stephane Dion, then Justin Trudeau’s foreign minister, spotted that UN Watch, a pro-Israeli lobby, had called Lynk “antisemitic” – the usual slur for anyone who criticises the actions of the Israeli government – and suggested that he be forced to resign. Lynk says that UN Watch’s claim prompted others to accuse him of being an anti-Semite.
We researched Fisk’s claim that UN Watch accused Lynk of being “antisemitic”, and couldn’t find any evidence to support it.  So, we contacted UN Watch, who flatly denied the charge in an email to us, and in the following tweet.

They told us, via email, and in a subsequent tweet, that they only documented Lynk’s anti-Israel bias and conflicts of interest in 2016.  Their accusation that Lynk “legitimized anti-Semites” by sharing a stage with Dimitri Lascaris, a racist who had been condemned by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for making “vile antisemitic smears”, wasn’t made until February of 2019.

Responding to our complaint, Indy editors revised Fisk’s false claim to note that UN Watch only accused Lynk of “legitimizing anti-Semites”:

When Lynk was appointed special rapporteur, Stephane Dion, then Justin Trudeau’s foreign minister, spotted that UN Watch, a pro-Israeli lobby, had accused Lynk of “legitimizing anti-semites”” – the usual slur for anyone who criticises the actions of the Israeli government – and suggested that he be forced to resign. Lynk says that UN Watch’s claim prompted others to accuse him of being an anti-Semite.

However, the paragraph is still wrong. 

The timeline shows that it isn’t possible that Dion, Trudeau’s foreign minister at the time, suggested that Lynk resign only after “spotting” UN Watch’s charge that Lynk had “legitimized anti-Semites”, because, as we noted, Dion criticised Lynk in 2016, the same year he was appointed as Special Rapporteur, whilst UN Watch’s charge that Lynk was “legitimizing anti-Semites wasn’t published until 2019.  Dion stepped down as foreign minister in 2017, two years prior to the UN Watch statement.

UN Watch’s Hillel Neuer clarified this in a subsequent tweet:

We’re following up on this additional error, and will update this post if there’s a further correction.

Related Articles

5 replies »

  1. Fisk is probably the only columnist at the Independent who has it written into his contract that no comments be allowed under his columns, lest he be Fisked. For if he were he’d be directly exposed as a fraud.

  2. Also, the “rewrite” of the smear he wrote is no better than the original. In the original the claim is that “called Lynk “antisemitic” – the usual slur for anyone who criticises the actions of the Israeli government”. Now the “usual slur” is ““legitimizing anti-semites”. Can’t be both.

    In fact the usual response to such inaccuracies and lies is that they are inacccuracies and lies, and then they get Fisked for lack of veracity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.